Skip to main content
HISTODEX

Scramble for Africa

c. 1870–c. 1914

From the 1870s to 1914, European powers competed to divide African territories, routes, and resources while African states and communities negotiated, resisted, and adapted.

African and European traders exchange goods at a river port while a steamship lies at anchor
Reconstruction note: This educational reconstruction is not a primary-source image of the event.
Period
c. 1870–c. 1914
Kind
War
Regions
Latin America
Keywords
Scramble for Africa · Berlin Conference · European colonization of Africa · war · modern · latin america

Follow the story · Four stages

  1. Background

    Industrial resource demand, interest in ports and rivers, and rivalry among European empires intensified intervention in African trade networks and political systems.

    • Industrial resource demand, interest in ports and rivers, and rivalry among European empires intensified intervention in African trade networks and political systems.
    • Core event: From the 1870s to 1914, European powers competed to divide African territories, routes, and resources while African states and communities negotiated, resisted, and adapted.
    • Connection to the next stage: At the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, European states discussed procedures for territorial claims. Treaties, military campaigns, trading stations, and railways then expanded effective occupation.
    Historical reconstruction of Scramble for Africa's background: Industrial resource demand, interest in ports and rivers, and rivalry among European empires intensified intervention in African trade networks and political systems.

  2. Course

    At the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, European states discussed procedures for territorial claims. Treaties, military campaigns, trading stations, and railways then expanded effective occupation.

    • At the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, European states discussed procedures for territorial claims.
    • Treaties, military campaigns, trading stations, and railways then expanded effective occupation.
    • Conditions behind the action: Industrial resource demand, interest in ports and rivers, and rivalry among European empires intensified intervention in African trade networks and political systems.
    Historical reconstruction of Scramble for Africa's central action: At the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, European states discussed procedures for territorial claims.

  3. Outcome

    By the early twentieth century, most of Africa was under European colonial rule, while Ethiopia and Liberia remained independent. Resistance and colonial borders left long political and social legacies.

    • By the early twentieth century, most of Africa was under European colonial rule, while Ethiopia and Liberia remained independent.
    • Resistance and colonial borders left long political and social legacies.
    • Process producing the result: At the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, European states discussed procedures for territorial claims. Treaties, military campaigns, trading stations, and railways then expanded effective occupation.
    Historical reconstruction of Scramble for Africa's immediate aftermath: By the early twentieth century, most of Africa was under European colonial rule, while Ethiopia and Liberia remained independent.

  4. Historical significance

    The Scramble was not only European diplomacy: African political actors, labor, trade, and resistance shaped its course. Colonial boundaries and systems of resource rule continued to influence postcolonial politics.

    • The Scramble was not only European diplomacy: African political actors, labor, trade, and resistance shaped its course.
    • Colonial boundaries and systems of resource rule continued to influence postcolonial politics.
    • Immediate consequence: By the early twentieth century, most of Africa was under European colonial rule, while Ethiopia and Liberia remained independent. Resistance and colonial borders left long political and social legacies.
    Historical reconstruction of Scramble for Africa's long-term consequences: The Scramble was not only European diplomacy: African political actors, labor, trade, and resistance shaped its course.

Related events

  1. c. 1800–c. 1870

    African trade networks and coastal exchange

    Historical reconstruction of the “African trade networks and coastal exchange” stage in Scramble for Africa

    African trade networks and coastal exchange — Background: Industrial resource demand, interest in ports and rivers, and rivalry among European empires intensified intervention in African trade networks and political systems.

  2. 1884–1885

    Berlin Conference

    Historical reconstruction of the “Berlin Conference” stage in Scramble for Africa

    Berlin Conference — Build-up: At the Berlin Conference of 1884–1885, European states discussed procedures for territorial claims. Treaties, military campaigns, trading stations, and railways then expanded effective occupation.

  3. c. 1885–c. 1900

    Effective occupation and territorial claims

    Current event

    Historical reconstruction of the “Effective occupation and territorial claims” stage in Scramble for Africa

    Effective occupation and territorial claims — Central transition: From the 1870s to 1914, European powers competed to divide African territories, routes, and resources while African states and communities negotiated, resisted, and adapted.

  4. c. 1890–c. 1910

    African resistance and colonial conquest

    Historical reconstruction of the “African resistance and colonial conquest” stage in Scramble for Africa

    African resistance and colonial conquest — Immediate result: By the early twentieth century, most of Africa was under European colonial rule, while Ethiopia and Liberia remained independent. Resistance and colonial borders left long political and social legacies.

  5. c. 1910–c. 1960

    Colonial borders and independence legacy

    Historical reconstruction of the “Colonial borders and independence legacy” stage in Scramble for Africa

    Colonial borders and independence legacy — Long-term significance: The Scramble was not only European diplomacy: African political actors, labor, trade, and resistance shaped its course. Colonial boundaries and systems of resource rule continued to influence postcolonial politics.

Sources